Answer #1

In the concept of implementing laws and exercising the practice of justice and fairness, there are legal terms commonly used among the people comprising such department. In the government, it is crucial that legal proceedings are adequately performed and concerns of the majority of the population are promptly addressed. In order for the common people and the authorities assigned to facilitate the necessary legal proceedings, one of the basic rules is to use legal terms understood by many. Two of the most common terms used in court trials and hearings as well as in investigations of cases are the words, facts and evidences.

A fact is a truth that is held and known to have a valid proof. Facts are most commonly established and remain to be in truth regardless of the changes in time, place or situation. Evidence, on the other hand, is something that has no proven source of truth. It has to be accepted only on belief, thereby making no assurance that the evidence presented holds only the truth.

Another major difference between facts and evidence is that evidences are at high risk for distortion, damage or alteration. Facts, on the contrary, can be proven by all means. A fact remains to be a fact no matter what the circumstance may be.

As a fundamental reality, facts are substantiated by the people and are therefore, strong enough not to be disputed in court. Evidences do not possess this power. Evidences can be disputed as it is only information that may or may not help in establishing a final decision in court.

While many are still confused regarding legal matters, it is vital that facts are well established and evidences are strong enough to support and facilitate the victory over a pending case.

Answered By: katrina [385 ]